Friday, October 28, 2016

INDIA-CHINA ECONOMIC RELATIONS

India and China Business 

 Trade deficit between Indiaand China has increased to USD 44.7 billion during April-January period of 2015-16, Parliament was informed today. 

India's exports to China stood at USD 7.56 billion during the period whereas the imports has jumped to USD 52.26 billion in April-January. 

In 2014-15, the deficit was aggregated at USD 48.48 billion. 

The Commerce Ministry's of both the countries have signed a Five-year Development Programme for Economic and Trade Cooperation in September 2014 to lay down a medium-term roadmap for promoting balanced and sustainable development of economic and trade relations, Commerce and Industry Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said in a written reply to the Rajya Sabha. 

The programme recognises "that the trade deficit with China is a matter of high concern for India", she said. 

"Against this backdrop and in the spirit of mutual benefit, India and China shall endeavour to strengthen cooperation and gradually achieve bilateral trade balance over the next 5 years," she said. 

In a separate reply she said that, India has so far initiated 322 anti-dumping cases out of which 177 cases involve China. 

"In order to boost exports and to maintain balance of trade with China, India has impressed upon China to recognise the need for reduction in trade imbalance for along term, sustainable and harmonious development of economic cooperation between the two countries,".

 India-China economic relations constitute an important element of the strategic and cooperative partnership between the two countries. Several institutional mechanisms have been established for enhancing and strengthening economic cooperation between the two countries. Besides the India-China Joint Economic Group on Economic Relations and Trade, Science and Technology (JEG) and the India-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue (SED), a Financial Dialogue has also been instituted  since 2006.

India-China Financial Dialogue: In accordance with the MoU signed during Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao’s visit to India in April 2005, the two sides have since successfully held eight Financial Dialogues in April 2006, December 2007, January 2009, September 2010,November 2011, September 2013, December 2014 and August 2016 respectively. The Eight India-China Financial Dialogue was held on August 19th in Beijing.During this Dialogue, the two sides held in-depth discussions on new challenges facing the global economy, macro-economic situations and policies in India and China, progress on structural reforms in both countries, cooperation under multilateral frameworks as well as bilateral financial cooperation. A Joint Statement was signed at the end of the Dialogue. The Ninth India-China Financial Dialogue is scheduled to be held in India.

Banking Links: Many Indian banks have established their presence in mainland China in the last few years. State Bank of India (Shanghai and Tianjin), Canara Bank (Shanghai), Bank of Baroda(Guangzhou), Bank of India (Shenzhen), Axis Bank(Shanghai) and ICICI (Shanghai)have branch offices in China. At present, the State Bank of India is the only Indian bank to have authorization to conduct local currency (RMB) business at its branch in Shanghai. Besides, the following representative offices of Indian banks are also operating in mainland China: Punjab National Bank, (Shanghai),Union Bank of India (Shanghai and Beijing Bank of India(Beijing), Union Bank of India (Beijing) and Indian Overseas Bank (Guangzhou)
  More Indian banks are planning to upgrade their Representative Offices in China to branch offices and existing branch offices are applying for RMB license.
  In early 2011,Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) secured a license to start banking operations in India. ICBC inaugurated their Mumbai branch on September 15, 2011. This marked the opening of the first branch of a mainland Chinese bank in India.
  Various government institutions and agencies from the two countries have also been interacting with each other for furthering cooperation in the areas such as taxation,auditing, human resource development and employment, health, urban and rural development and tourism. There is a close exchange and interaction between the economic think tanks and scholars as well.

Wednesday, October 26, 2016

Trump accepting the US election result has little practical consequence

Donald Trump's anomalous suggestion that he may not accept the outcome of the elections has startled the public and was widely criticized. But as a practical matter it will likely have little significance.


On the homestretch of the US presidential election campaign Donald Trump went back to his old Republican primary playbook.
In the race for the Republican nomination he had not just repeatedly complained about being treated unfairly by the GOP and the media, he also had threatened to not accept that outcome and to mount an independent bid.
In last week's third and final presidential debate Trump took his approach of questioning the democratic process to a whole new level when he suggested that he may not accept the outcome of the presidential election contest between him and his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton.
Improper statement
While Trump used the same vocabulary of a "rigged system" he employed in the primary, the public backlash against his remarks was far greater. Even leading Republicans were outraged that their candidate seemed to question the democratic process even before any ballots had been counted, and they urged him to accept the outcome of polls.
"It was improper to say what he said and the way that he said it, given the role of a candidate in a democracy for the office that he is seeking," said Edward Foley, director of the election law program at Ohio State University.
But while Trump's remark was widely viewed as another low point which might further alienate voters' interest in an already toxic presidential campaign, it will likely have little practical consequence.     
No recourse
"This has no meaning whatsoever," said Benjamin Ginsberg, a political science professor at Johns Hopkins University. "It's simply a statement of sour grapes. I think he said it without thinking it through. If at the end of the day he says, 'I don't accept the result of the election,' so what?"
Trump's questioning of the election outcome may have made some sense in the Republican primary, noted Ginsberg, as he could threaten to act as a spoiler by deciding to run as an independent or by urging his voters to not support any nominee other than himself. But in the presidential race, it's an empty threat, he quipped. "What's Trump's recourse - he'll cry?
That's because to challenge the national election outcome on a whole, as Trump seemed to suggest, is practically impossible as the election is carried out and tallied on a state level. As a consequence election results can only be challenged in an individual state if the results are close. But even that step is usually not necessary, explains election law scholar Foley.
Lack of knowledge
"Most states have what they call automatic or mandatory recounts that get triggered by close margins." The trigger for an automatic recount is usually a margin of 0.5 percentage points and doesn't require any action on the part of the candidates.
"I do think the words that he has used suggest some lack of knowledge of the mechanics of the process and how the system works," said Foley.
Because for Trump's remark of not accepting the election outcome to have any real significance, the Republican presidential candidate would need to finish the race at least within striking distance of the 270 electoral college votes needed to win the White House. Only if victory hinges on one or two states where Clinton and Trump are head-to-head is there even a case for legal recourse, said the experts.    
"It's vanishingly rare how often this happens," said Foley. While the 2000 presidential election recount battle in the decisive state of Florida between Al Gore and George W. Bush is often mentioned, it's important to remember that this was an outlier and not the rule.
Best legal minds
"If you go back to 1876, there were three states that were in play and that were outcome determinative," said Foley. In the 1884 and 1916 presidential elections New York and California were tipping states and in each case it took two weeks to determine the winner, noted Foley.  
But at least for now most election polls have Clinton winning comfortably enough to mute any reasonable discussion about legal action. Should that change between now and Election Day, noted Foley, Trump and Clinton have hired the best hands to fight over any possible election disputes. "Were there to be litigation over the election, both sides would have high powered legal talent that they could bring to bear on this."

Thursday, October 20, 2016

Indo and US Relations with Modi Effect


                             Indo and US Relations with Modi Effect


U.S.-India Relations:

Since India’s independence, ties with the United States have weathered Cold War-era distrust and estrangement over India’s nuclear program. Relations have warmed in recent years and cooperation has strengthened across a range of economic and political areas.

India Declares Independence:

Britain declares the end of its colonial rule of the subcontinent and passes the Indian Independence Act, which divides the territory into Muslim-majority Pakistan and secular India, whose population is majority Hindu. Violent clashes between Hindus, Sikhs, and Muslims follow, and as many as a million die in bloodshed amidst the forced migration of up to twenty million people.

Prime Minister Nehru Visits U.S.:

Prime Minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru meets with U.S. president Harry S. Truman on a multi-week tour tour of the United States. The trip precedes India’s formal proclamation of neutrality in the developing Cold War, in which it would take a leadership role within the Non-Alignment movement. This sets the tone for U.S.-India relations throughout the Cold War, creating constraints within the relationship, as well as opportunity for amity between Delhi and Moscow.

President Eisenhower Visits India:

President Dwight Eisenhower is the first serving U.S. president to visit the country. Eisenhower meets with President Rajendra Prasad and Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, and addresses Parliament.

India, China Fight Border War:

War breaks out between India and China over a disputed frontier. Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru writes to President John F. Kennedy to request support from the United States. Washington supports India in the conflict, recognizing the McMahon line as the border, and provides air assistance and arms. Until the 1965 India-Pakistan War, strategic and military ties between Washington and Delhi remain close.

U.S. Agronomist Spurs Food Revolution:

Norman Borlaug travels to India to begin testing high-yield wheat varieties. His collaboration with Indian scientist Dr. M.S. Swaminathan results in the “Green Revolution,” and India goes from food scarcity to self-sufficiency within a decade.








1971 India, Pakistan Go to War:

India and Pakistan become embroiled in their third conflict as Pakistan descends into a civil war that ends with the creation of Bangladesh, formerly East Pakistan, on December 6. Despite evidence of the Pakistan Army’s violence against its own citizens in East Pakistan, the United States sides with Islamabad, given its mediating role in Nixon’s rapprochement with China. India also signs a twenty-year Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation with the Soviet Union in August, sharply deviating from its previous position of non-alignment in the Cold War.


May 18, 1974 India Completes First Nuclear Test:

India detonates its first nuclear device, becoming the first nation outside the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council to have declared nuclear capabilities. The move contributes to a period of estrangement between the United States and India that lasts over two decades.

January 1, 1978 President Carter Visits India:

U.S. President Jimmy Carter visits India on a three-day official trip to meet with Indian President Neelam Sanjiva Reddy and Prime Minister Morarji Desai, and address Parliament. Desai reciprocates with an official six-day visit to Washington in June.

March 10, 1978 U.S. Enacts Nonproliferation Act:

The Carter administration enacts the Nuclear Nonproliferation Act, which requires countries not included in the Nonproliferation Treaty—which includes India—to allow inspections of all nuclear facilities by the International Atomic Energy Agency. India refuses, and Washington ends all nuclear assistance to Delhi.

October 31, 1984 Indira Gandhi Assassinated

Prime Minister Indira Gandhi is assassinated at her New Delhi residence by Sikh security guards seeking vengeance after her authorization of a military attack on a revered Sikh temple in Amritsar five months prior. Gandhi, the daughter of India’s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, first took office in 1966. She made a state visit to Washington in 1982, which was followed by a high-level U.S. visit led by Vice President George H.W. Bush. She is succeeded by her son, Rajiv.

December 3, 1984 Bhopal Leak
A toxic gas and chemical leak at American-owned Union Carbide Pesticide Plant in Bhopal, India kills thousands. India unsuccessfully seeks extradition of the company’s chief executive from the United States for criminal prosecution as the death and disability toll climbs to the tens of thousands in the ensuing years. The incident harms U.S.-India relations, and continues to complicate the bilateral relationship years after.




May 20, 1990 U.S. Crisis Mission to Region:
Deputy National Security Advisor Robert Gates travels to India and Pakistan to defuse tensions over the rapidly escalating insurgency in Kashmir. The trip comes amid fears of potential nuclear warfare between Pakistan and India.

July 24, 1991 Economic Reforms:
The government of Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao, launches sweeping economic reforms that help expand economic ties with the United States. Finance Minister Manmohan Singh oversees the opening of India’s economy to international trade and investment, deregulation, initiation of privatisation, tax reforms, and inflation-controlling measures that catalyze decades of fast growth.

May 11, 1998 India Tests Nuclear Devices:

The Indian government announces the completion of a series of underground nuclear tests close to the border with Pakistan, surprising U.S. intelligence organizations and raising fears the move could spark a regional nuclear arms race. The tests draw international condemnation and badly damage India’s relationship with the United States. After recalling the U.S. ambassador to India, President Bill Clinton imposes economic sanctions, required under U.S. law.

March 3, 1999 Pakistan, India Clash in Kashmir

Pakistani forces infiltrate Indian-administered Kashmir. India launches air strikes in return, and armed conflict continues through early July. After President Clinton summons Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to Washington for a Fourth of July emergency meeting, Sharif withdraws Pakistani forces from their positions beyond the Line of Control.

March 20, 2000 Clinton Trip Signals Warming Ties:

President Bill Clinton makes the first U.S. presidential trip to India since 1978. The visit ends the estrangement of the post-1998 Indian nuclear weapons tests, although the Clinton administration presses India’s government to sign the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. The Indo-U.S. Science and Technology Forum is also established during the visit. As India’s economy begins to take off, the trip indicates a further shift in Washington’s regional orientation away from its Cold War alliance with Pakistan.

September 22, 2001 U.S. Lifts India Sanctions:

The George W. Bush administration lifts all remaining U.S. sanctions (PDF) that were imposed on India after its 1998 nuclear test. Most economic sanctions had been eased within a few months of their imposition, and Congress authorized the president to remove all remaining restrictions in 1999.

March 15, 2005 Energy Security Dialogue:
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice visits New Delhi, where she and Indian officials agree to start a dialogue on energy security. The visit underscores an upswing in relations despite tensions over India’s possible energy cooperation with Iran and the U.S. sale of fighter jets to Pakistan.


June 28, 2005 U.S., India Sign New Defense Framework:

The United States and India sign the New Framework for the U.S.-India Defense Relationship (PDF), which sets priorities for defense cooperation in maritime security, humanitarian assistance/disaster relief, and counterterrorism. In October, the two countries conduct the largest naval exercise to date, followed by major air and land exercises.

July 18, 2005 Landmark Civil Nuclear Deal:

India and the United States ink the Civil Nuclear Cooperation Initiative, a ten-year defense framework that lifts a three-decade U.S. moratorium on nuclear trade with India. Under the agreement, India agrees to separate its civil and military nuclear facilities and place all its civil resources under IAEA safeguards. In exchange, the United States agrees to work toward full civil nuclear cooperation with India. Congress gives final approval in October 2008.

March 1, 2006 President George W. Bush Visits India

U.S. President George W. Bush makes a visit to India, where he and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh finalize the framework of the civil nuclear deal and boost security and economic ties. The nuclear deal, completed in July 2007, makes India the only country outside of the Nonproliferation Treaty that has nuclear capabilities and is allowed to participate in nuclear commerce.

November 26, 2008 Terrorists Attack Taj Mahal Palace Hotel:

Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorists from Pakistan attack the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel in Mumbai. More than three hundred citizens die in the three-day conflagration, including six Americans. The United States cooperates closely with Indian authorities, sending FBI investigators and forensics experts.

November 24, 2009 Prime Minister Manmohan Singh Begins U.S. State Visit:

U.S. President Barack Obama hosts the inaugural state visit of Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Despite its symbolic importance, the trip fails to yield any significant breakthroughs in the bilateral relationship.

April 5, 2010 Economic and Financial Partnership:

U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner makes his first official trip to India to launch the new U.S.-India Economic and Financial Partnership with Indian Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee. The ministerial-level meetings kick off an effort to institutionalize deeper bilateral relations on economic and financial sector issues.

June 1, 2010 U.S., India Hold First Strategic Dialogue:
The United States and India formally convene the first U.S.-India Strategic Dialogue. A large, high-ranking delegation of Indian officials visits Washington, DC, and Secretary Clinton lauds India as “an indispensable partner.” President Obama says the relationship “will be a defining partnership in the twenty-first century.” Subsequent dialogues follow annually.

November 5, 2010 Obama Backs India Bid for UN Security Council:

President Obama visits India, where he addresses Parliament and backs the country’s long-held bid for a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council. The trip also highlights the countries’ economic ties, with Obama announcing $14.9 billion in trade deals. However, trade concerns around access to Indian markets and issues surrounding civil nuclear cooperation cloud the talks.

July 19, 2011 U.S., India Ink Cyber security Memorandum:

The United States and India sign a Memorandum of Understanding in New Delhi to promote closer cybersecurity cooperation. The agreement is designed to fulfill one of the pillars of the U.S.-India Strategic Dialogue.

May 30, 2012 Panetta Boosts Military Ties:
Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta visits India to bolster military ties in the wake of the Obama administration’s announced “pivot” to Asia. The trip marks the first such visit since former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates met with Indian counterparts in January 2010.

September 27, 2013 Singh Makes Last Visit to Washington:
Manmohan Singh visits Washington in his last visit to the United States as India’s prime minister. The trip, which focuses on security, trade, immigration reform, and the civilian nuclear deal, marks the third meeting between Singh and Obama in four years. It comes amid a backdrop of domestic political issues in Delhi, a troubled Indian economy, and a government shutdown crippling Washington.

March 31, 2014 Diplomatic Row Sours Ties:

The U.S. embassy in India announces Ambassador Nancy Powell’s resignation in the wake of a dispute over the arrest of an Indian diplomat in New York. The announcement comes amid the run-up to high-profile national elections.

May 20, 2014 Obama Invites Modi to U.S.:
The Hindu nationalist BJP party wins national elections in a landslide, elevating Narendra Modi to prime minister. President Barack Obama congratulates Modi and invites him to the White House, reversing an earlier visa ban. Modi had been barred from entering the country over U.S. concerns about the 2002 massacre of Muslims in the state of Gujarat, which occurred when Modi was the state’s chief minister.

January 24, 2015 Obama's Second India Visit Elevates Ties:


U.S. President Barack Obama makes his second visit to India as head of state for India's Republic Day celebrations. The president heralds the relationship between the world's two largest democracies, saying, "America can be India's best partner." Obama and Indian PM Modi announce a breakthrough on nuclear-related issues that could help implement the U.S.-India civil nuclear deal. Six months later, U.S. Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter and India’s defense minister, Manohar Parrikar, sign documents to renew the ten-year U.S.-India Defense Framework Agreement.

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Two years Review of Modi or Indian government

Two years of Modi government: a review


For the first time in 30 years, the BJP came to power with an absolute majority and the swearing-in ceremony gave a hint that Team Modi was ready with a game-changing plan for the country. Two years into governance, we look back at the Centre's performance.

Yemen evacuation







This was one of the biggest evacuations during the times of war, since the Gulf War I. MoS Gen. (Retd) V.K. Singh personally oversaw the operation. The External Affairs Minister headed bySushma Swaraj earned laurels for helping the Indians living abroad, be it for rescuing Kerala nursesfrom war-torn Libya or bringing back differently-abled Geeta from Pakistan.
Jan Dhan Yojana
Anyone can now open an account in a bank, thanks to this financial inclusion scheme. Barely a fortnight after the launch, the yojana entered the Guiness Book of World Records for the maximum number of accounts opened in a week. The scheme is a big boost in moving towards direct subsidy transfer.
LPG subsidy reforms
Initially started as a ‘Give It Up’ campaign, the Petroleum and Natural Gas Ministry headed byDharmendra Pradhan barred LPG subsidy to customers who earn more than Rs. 10 lakh per annum. The amount saved was used to give over five lakh new LPG connections to those who still use firewoods or kerosene stoves for cooking.
Swachh Bharat Mission



A pet project of Mr. Modi, sanitation ministry's Swachh Bharat mission got wide public support, especially on social media after celebrities joined the Clean India challenge. Not just stopping with cleaning the locality, the government has taken initiatives such as building more toilets, waste management and waste segregation. Real success, will however happen, when manual scavenging is completely eradicated.
India-Bangladesh land boundary agreement
When India is facing boundary disputes with every neighbour, this agreement gives optimism that issues can be amicably solved over diplomacy. The people living in the enclaves that were recently annexed to India even exercised their franchise in the recently concluded West Bengal Assembly elections.
Bankruptcy code
At a time when bankers were grappling with huge rise in non-performing assets and government eyeing to create more entrepreneurs, the amendment of existing bankruptcy laws was necessary. With the support from Congress, the law was passed in Rajya Sabha during the Budget Session where the ruling party was short of numbers.
Real Estate regulation
Apart from making the process transparent and keeping checks and balances in the form of a Real Estate Regulatory Authority, the law drafted by Housing Ministry headed by M. Venkaiah Naidu gave confidence to home-buyers. When housing sector contributes to nine per cent of GDP, this law, if effectively implemented by the States, is a game-changer in the housing sector.
Yoga Day
 India’s lobbying got success when the United Nations declared June 21 as International Yoga Day. The mass yoga performance at Rajpath, which was led by Mr. Modi himself, set the record of most number of people participating in such an event.
Mann Ki Baat
A first such initiative in India where a top leader addresses millions, that too periodically. The programme even featured U.S. President Barack Obama during his visit to India.
Digital India
This flagship programme of Ravi Shankar Prasad's Communications Ministry aiming to create a knowledge economy and good governance is travelling in the right path. Every minister and every ministry is now on Twitter. A slew of e- overnance measures like digital locker and feedbacks through mygov.in are some notable initiatives.

Pathankot attack


The attack at IAF air base, just few hours from the National Capital, is the first of its kind after the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. There were differences of opinion over the way in which the encounter was handled,Home Minister Rajnath Singh was kept out of key meetings at the time of attacks and to make things worse, there was confusion over the number if terrorists sneaked in to carry out the attack. The attack raised questions on the security-level at India’s military bases.
Masood Azhar
India’s efforts to add the name of Masood Azhar, the chief of JeM, in the UN list of proscribed terroristsfailed as China raised objections to it. This is a major setback to India as Azhar is believed to be behind the Pathankot attack.
India-Pak relations
Much to the hype of Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif attending the swearing-in ceremony or the saree diplomacy, both governments couldn’t re-start the dialogue process nor has the firing across the Line of Control came down. Mr. Modi’s surprise stop-over at Lahore too failed to cut the ice.
India-Nepal relations
Anti-India protests flared up in Nepal after trade movements through the border were not allowed for many days. Nepal called it 'India's blockade' as it followed protests by Madhesis. All of these happened within a year of the Himalayan quake, when Nepal thanked India’s help in rescue and rehabilitation. Also, India couldn’t keep away Nepal from moving closer to China.

Dissidence in Central Universities
Smriti Irani and the Union Ministry of Human Resource and Development was in news for all wrong reasons. The suicide of a Dalit Research Scholar at Hyderabad Central University, sedition charges against students of Jawaharlal Nehru University, the FTII students’ strike, decision ofnot to support off-campus centres of Aligarh Muslim University, closing down Ambedkar-Periyar Study circle in IIT-Madras, the list goes on. And some avoidable controversies such ascompetition for schoolchildren on Christmas orscrapping German being taught at CBSE schools.
Blackmoney
Bringing back money stashed in off-shore accounts was one of BJP’s poll promises. The government gave a three-month window for compliance, but only 644 declarations were made. Finance Minister Arun Jaitley once said the bulk of blackmoney is within India, but little has been done to contain the feeders of parallel economy – higher education, real estate and mining.
GST Bill/Land ordinance:
The government is unable to pass the GST Bill in Rajya Sabha for the past two years. Touted as the biggest tax reform in Independent India, the government is unable to bring consensus. Same is the fate of land bill. Though the Centre took the ordinance route to clear the bill, it was re-promulgated twice and lapsed on August 31, 2015.
Uttarakhand fiasco
The pre-mature imposition of President’s Rule in Uttarakhand, and victory of Harish Rawat in the Supreme Court-monitored floor test, is not only an embarrassment to the ruling government but also to the BJP, whose attempt to gain from dissidence in Uttarakhand Congress misfired.

Silence on fringe right-wing groups
Law and order could be a State subject. Murders of rationalists and attacks on minority community by fringe right-wing elements may not be limited to the BJP-ruled states. But the Centre as well as the Prime Minister’s refrains from condemning or making comments against such attacks didn’t go well with the public.
Women’s Bill
The bill seeking one-third representation for women in Parliament and State Assemblies is an almost-forgotten topic now. Cleared in Rajya Sabha in 2010, the Bill is pending in the lower House, in which the BJP front enjoys comfortable majority.
Smart City plans

It is impossible to create a city, that too a ‘smart’ one in two years. But the BJP government has kickstarted the process by short listing 20 cities in the first phase. Mr. Jaitley’s maiden budget allocated 7,060 crore for the development of 100 smart cities.
Make In India
Another pet project of Mr. Modi to make India the manufacturing hub, the government is taking efforts by easing foreign investment norms, revamping labour laws and cutting down the red tape. India has conducted road shows abroad and Mr. Modi has travelled several countries to gather support. Many multi-nationals have pledged their support.
EPFO reforms
The government introduced universal access number (UAN) to all EPF holders to make transfer of PF accounts easy when switching jobs. The good name earned from the working class soon vanished when the Finance Minister proposed tax at premature withdrawal of provident fund. It was roll backed after protest by garment workers crippled Bengaluru.
OROP
The One Rank One Pension scheme, a long-pending demand of ex-servicemen was accepted by the government, but with caveats. Premature retirees have been excluded and the pension review will be carried out every year. Though all demands of veterans have not been met, the government will be remembered for bringing a 40-year-long struggle to an end.
Planning Commission to NITI Aayog
Doing away with the more than six-decade practice of Planning Commission, the government came up with a think-tank approach to economic strategy. The acronym NITI (National Institution for Transforming India) itself invited criticism of government pushing pro-Hindi agenda and opposition ridiculing it as aniti and durniti. For a nation so used to Planning Commission allocating funds every year, time will tell the effect of this new approach.
UDAY
The Power Ministry headed by Piyush Goyal plans to aid discoms and State governments to raise upto Rs. 1.75 lakh crore through bonds to improve the health of power distribution sector. Eighteen states have agreed to take part in the scheme. The plan also aiming to curb power theft and pilfirage, appears good on paper. What needs to be seen is how it is implemented.
Aadhaar(UID)
The government saved Aadhaar from turning to a white elephant by passing the Aadhaar Bill. However, questions remain on why was it made a money bill, would the constitution be amended to give more teeth to Aadhaar, or would the UIDAI compromise on privacy. The Centre’s Digital India and host of welfare measures rely on Aadhaar. Will Aadhaar be just another card or will it truly make a change should be watched.

Ganga rejunuvation
The Modi government created a separate ministry headed by Uma Bharti to clean the river and protect it’s ecosystem. The Namami Gange project with a budget of Rs. 20,000 crores over a period of five years has been cleared. Ms. harti claims Ganga will be cleaned by 2018. The deadline appears tight but nonetheless, the clamour for a cleaner river has gained momentum.
Bullet train
Imagine travelling to Mumbai from Ahmedabad within two hours? That’s what a bullet train would do if the deal with Japan is implemented. China has expressed interest in developing the Chennai-Delhi bullet train corridor. But a single bullet train corridor requiring about Rs. 98,000 crores questions the viability of the project.
Welfare Schemes
A slew of insurance schemes namely crop insurance for farmers, Atal Pension Yojana for the unorganised sector, affordable health insurance coverage, and the Jan Aushadhi Yojana for retail sales of generic drugs were introduced in the last two years.. In addition, the government has re-launched Kisan Vikas Patra and introduced a PPF-equivalent for girl child, the Sukanya Samriddhi Scheme. Again, in country known from socialist welfare schemes, the onus of welfare shifting from government to individual is an ideological change and may take time for acceptance.

----------------------------------Thank you-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reserver Bank of India (RBI) Credit Debit Card Policy

A. Purpose: To provide a framework of rules/regulations/standards/practices to the credit, debit, prepaid card issuing banks and to the credit card issuing NBFCs to ensure that the same are in alignment with the best customer practices. Banks should adopt adequate safeguards and implement the following guidelines in order to ensure that their card operations are run on sound, prudent and customer friendly manner.
B. Classification: A statutory guideline issued by the RBI.
C. Previous guidelines consolidated: This Master Circular consolidates the instructions contained in the circulars listed in the Appendix.
D. Scope of Application: To all Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs) that engage in credit, debit, prepaid card business directly or through their subsidiaries or affiliated companies controlled by them and to all NBFCs that engage in credit card business.
Structure
I. Credit Card Operations of banks
1. Introduction
1.1 Background
1.2 Basic features of credit cards
1.3 Types of credit cards
1.4 Fair Practices Code
2. Issue of cards
3. Interest rates and other charges
4. Wrongful billing
5. Use of DSAs/ DMAs and other agents
6.  Protection of customers’ rights
6.1 Right to privacy
6.2 Customer confidentiality
6.3 Fair practices in debt collection
7. Redressal of Grievances
8. Internal control and monitoring systems
9. Fraud Control
10. Right to impose penalty
II. Issue of Debit Cards by banks
1 Introduction
2 Board approved policy
3 Types of debit cards
4 Offline debit cards
5 Compliance with KYC norms/AML standards/CFT obligations of banks under PMLA, 2002
6 Payment of interest on balances
7 Terms and conditions for issue of cards to customers
8 Cash withdrawals
9 Security and other aspects
10 Compliance with DPSS instructions
11 Issue of International Debit Card
12 Review of operations
13 Reporting requirements
14 Redressal of grievances
15 Co-branding arrangement
16. Unsolicited Commercial Communication
III. Issue of Rupee Denominated Co-Branded Prepaid Cards
1 Introduction
2 Board approved policy
3 Due diligence
4 Outsourcing of activities
5 Role of non-bank entity
6 Compliance with KYC norms/AML standards/CFT obligations of banks under PMLA, 2002
7 Confidentiality of customer information
8 Payment of interest
9 Compliance with DPSS guidelines on issue and operation of prepaid instruments in India
10. Unsolicited Commercial Communication
Annex- Most Important Terms and Conditions
Appendix – List of circulars consolidated
I. Credit Card Operations of Banks
1   Introduction
1.1 Background
This circular is aimed at providing general guidance to banks/NBFCs on their credit card operations, and the systems and controls expected of them in managing their credit card business. It also sets out the best practices that they should aim to achieve.
Experience has shown that the quality of banks’ credit card portfolios mirrors the economic environment in which they operate. Very often, there is a strong correlation between an economic downturn and deterioration in the quality of such portfolios. The deterioration may become even more serious if banks have relaxed their credit underwriting criteria and risk management standards as a result of intense competition in the market. It is therefore important for banks to maintain prudent policies and practices for managing the risks of their credit card business which are relevant to the market environment that they operate in.
To facilitate a better understanding of the credit card operations, the basic features of credit cards and their associated operations are highlighted in the sub­sections below.
1.2 Basic features of credit cards
The term “credit card” usually/generally refers to a plastic card assigned to a cardholder, usually with a credit limit, that can be used to purchase goods and services on credit or obtain cash advances.
Credit cards allow cardholders to pay for purchases made over a period of time, and to carry a balance from one billing cycle to the next. Credit card purchases normally become payable after a free credit period, during which no interest or finance charge is imposed. Interest is charged on the unpaid balance after the payment is due. Cardholders may pay the entire amount due and save on the interest that would otherwise be charged. Alternatively, they have the option of paying any amount, as long as it is higher than the minimum amount due, and carrying forward the balance.
A credit card scheme typically involves the following parties:
  • Cardholders - persons who are authorized to use credit cards for the payment of goods and services;
  • Card issuers - institutions which issue credit cards;
  • Merchants - entities which agree to accept credit cards for payment of goods and services;
  • Merchant acquirers – Banks/NBFCs which enter into agreements with merchants to process their credit card transactions; and
  • Credit card associations - organisations that license card issuers to issue credit cards under their trademark, e.g. Visa and MasterCard, and provide settlement services for their members (i.e. card issuers and merchant acquirers).
Credit card schemes normally operate at an international level too, meaning that cardholders belonging to card issuers in one country can make purchases at the place of business of merchants in another country.
The focus of this circular is on the operations, risks and controls associated with credit card schemes of which banks (or their subsidiaries or affiliated companies under their control) are either the card issuer or the merchant acquirer.
1.3  Types of credit cards
Credit cards can be broadly categorised into two types:
General purpose cards and private label cards: The former are issued under the trademark of credit card associations (VISA and Mastercard) and accepted by many merchants while the latter are only accepted by specific retailers (e.g. a departmental store).
Banks in India can undertake credit card business either departmentally or through a subsidiary company set up for the purpose. They can also undertake domestic credit card business by entering into tie-up arrangement with one of the banks already having arrangements for issue of credit cards.
Prior approval of the Reserve Bank is not necessary for banks desirous of undertaking credit card business either independently or in tie-up arrangement with other card issuing banks. Banks can do so with the approval of their Boards. However, only banks with networth of `100 crore and above should undertake credit card business. Banks desirous of setting up separate subsidiaries for undertaking credit card business would, however, require prior approval of the Reserve Bank. Banks should adopt adequate safeguards and implement the guidelines enunciated in this circular in order to ensure that their credit card operations are run in a sound, prudent and customer friendly manner.
Most of the card issuing banks in India offer general purpose credit cards. These cards are normally categorised by banks as platinum, gold or classic to differentiate the services offered on each card and the income eligibility criteria. Banks may, at the request of a cardholder, issue a supplementary card (also referred to as ‘add-on cards’) to another individual who is usually an immediate family member of the cardholder.
It is quite common for banks to partner with business corporations or non-profit making organisations (e.g. charitable or professional bodies) to issue co-branded cards. However they need to undertake due diligence on the non-bank entity to protect themselves against the reputation risk to which they are exposed to in such an arrangement. NBFCs, which desire to enter into a co-branding arrangement for issue of credit cards with banks, may be guided by the instructions contained in circular No. DNBS (PD) CC No.83/03.10.27/2006-07 dated December 04, 2006
Banks may also issue corporate credit cards to the employees of their corporate customers.
The types of credit cards mentioned above are illustrative and not exhaustive. Banks may, from time to time, introduce new credit card products to satisfy customer needs and cater to the changes in market conditions.
1.4  Fair Practices Code
Each bank must have a well documented policy and a Fair Practices Code for credit card operations. The Banking Codes and Standards of India (BCSBI) has released a “Code of Bank’s Commitment to Customers”(Code) in July 2006 as also a Guidance Note in December 2006, which have been adopted by most of the banks with the approval of their Boards. Such of the banks which have subscribed to the BCSBI Code may incorporate the principles contained in BCSBI Code for evolving their Fair Practices Code for credit card operations, in lieu of IBA Fair Practices Code for credit card operations. The banks’ Fair Practices Code, should at a minimum, incorporate the relevant guidelines contained in this Master Circular. Banks/NBFCs should also widely disseminate the contents of this Master Circular, including through their websites.
2 Issue of cards
2.1 Banks/NBFCs should ensure prudence while issuing credit cards and independently assess the credit risk while issuing cards to persons, especially to students and others with no independent financial means. Add-on cards i.e. those that are subsidiary to the principal card, may be issued with the clear understanding that the liability will be that of the principal cardholder.
2.2 In terms of the instructions contained in the circular DBOD.No.Leg.BC.65/09.07.005/2006-07 dated March 6, 2007, banks have been advised that in case of all categories of loans irrespective of any threshold limits, including credit card applications, banks should convey in writing the main reason/reasons which in the opinion of the bank have led to the rejection of the loan applications. It is reiterated that banks should convey in writing the main reason/reasons which have led to the rejection of the credit card applications.
2.3 As holding several credit cards enhances the total credit available to any consumer, banks/NBFCs should assess the credit limit for a credit card customer having regard to the limits enjoyed by the cardholder from other banks on the basis of self- declaration/ credit information.
2.4 The card issuing banks/NBFCs would be solely responsible for fulfillment of all KYC requirements, even where DSAs / DMAs or other agents solicit business on their behalf.
2.5 While issuing cards, the terms and conditions for issue and usage of a credit card should be mentioned in clear and simple language (preferably in English, Hindi and the local language) comprehensible to a card user. The Most Important Terms and Conditions (MITCs) termed as standard set of conditions, as given in the Annex, should be highlighted and advertised/ sent separately to the prospective customer/ customers at all the stages i.e. during marketing, at the time of application, at the acceptance stage (welcome kit) and in important subsequent communications.
3  Interest rates and other charges
3.1   Credit card dues are in the nature of non-priority sector personal loans and as such, upto June 30, 2010, banks were free to determine the rate of interest on credit card dues without reference to their BPLR and regardless of the size in terms of the Directives on Interest rates on advances. However, with the introduction of Base Rate system with effect from July 1, 2010, all categories of loans, except certain specified exemptions, should be priced only with reference to the Base Rate.
3.2   Banks are advised to be guided by the instructions on interest rate on advances, as amended from time to time, while determining the interest rate on credit card dues. Banks have also been advised that they should prescribe a ceiling rate of interest, including processing and other charges, in respect of small value personal loans and loans similar in nature. The above instructions are applicable to credit card dues also. In case, banks/ NBFCs charge interest rates which vary based on the payment/ default history of the cardholder, there should be transparency in levying of such differential interest rates. In other words, the fact that higher interest rates are being charged to the cardholder on account of his payment / default history should be made known to the cardholder. For this purpose, the banks should publicise through their website and other means, the interest rates charged to various categories of customers. Banks/NBFCs should upfront indicate to the credit card holder, the methodology of calculation of finance charges with illustrative examples, particularly in situations where a part of the amount outstanding is only paid by the customer.
3.3   Further, the banks/NBFCs have to adhere to the following guidelines relating to interest rates and other charges on credit cards:
  1. Card issuers should ensure that there is no delay in dispatching bills and the customer has sufficient number of days (at least one fortnight) for making payment before the interest starts getting charged. In order to obviate frequent complaints of delayed billing, the credit card issuing bank/NBFC may consider providing bills and statements of accounts online, with suitable security measures. Banks/ NBFCs could also consider putting in place a mechanism to ensure that the customer’s acknowledgement is obtained for receipt of the monthly statement.
  2. Card issuers should quote Annualized Percentage Rates (APR) on card products (separately for retail purchase and for cash advance, if different). The method of calculation of APR should be given with a couple of examples for better comprehension. The APR charged and the annual fee should be shown with equal prominence. The late payment charges, including the method of calculation of such charges and the number of days, should be prominently indicated. The manner in which the outstanding unpaid amount will be included for calculation of interest should also be specifically shown with prominence in all monthly statements. Even where the minimum amount indicated to keep the card valid has been paid, it should be indicated in bold letters that the interest will be charged on the amount due after the due date of payment. These aspects may be shown in the Welcome Kit in addition to being shown in the monthly statement. A legend/notice to the effect that “Making only the minimum payment every month would result in the repayment stretching over years with consequent interest payment on your outstanding balance" should be prominently displayed in all the monthly statements so as to caution the customers about the pitfalls in paying only the minimum amount due.
  3. Banks/NBFCs should step up their efforts on educating the cardholders of the implications of paying only ‘the minimum amount due’. The “Most Important Terms and Conditions” should specifically explain that the ‘free credit period’ is lost if any balance of the previous month’s bill is outstanding. For this purpose, banks/ NBFCs could work out illustrative examples and include the same in the Welcome Kit sent to the cardholders as also place it on their website.
  4. The banks /NBFCs should not levy any charge that was not explicitly indicated to the credit card holder at the time of issue of the card and without getting his / her consent. However, this would not be applicable to charges like service taxes, etc. which may subsequently be levied by the Government or any other statutory authority.
  5. The terms and conditions for payment of credit card dues, including the minimum payment due, should be stipulated so as to ensure that there is no negative amortization.
  6. Changes in charges (other than interest) may be made only with prospective effect giving notice of at least one month. If a credit card holder desires to surrender his credit card on account of any change in credit card charges to his disadvantage, he may be permitted to do so without the bank levying any extra charge for such closure. Any request for closure of a credit card has to be honoured immediately by the credit card issuer, subject to full settlement of dues by the cardholder.
  7. There should be transparency (without any hidden charges) in issuing credit cards free of charge during the first year.
4.  Wrongful billing
The card issuing bank/NBFC should ensure that wrong bills are not raised and issued to customers. In case, a customer protests any bill, the bank/ NBFC should provide explanation and, if necessary, documentary evidence may also be provided  to the customer within a maximum period of sixty days with a spirit to amicably redress the grievances.
5  Use of Direct Sales Agent (DSAs) / Direct Marketing Agents (DMAs) and other agents
5.1.  When banks /NBFCs outsource the various credit card operations, they have to be extremely careful that the appointment of such service providers does not compromise with the quality of the customer service and the banks'/NBFCs' ability to manage credit, liquidity and operational risks. In the choice of the service provider, the banks/NBFCs have to be guided by the need to ensure confidentiality of the customer’s records, respect customer privacy, and adhere to fair practices in debt collection.
5.2 In terms of the BCSBI’s Code of Bank’s Commitment to Customers, banks which have subscribed to the Code are required to prescribe a Code of Conduct for their DSAs whose services are engaged by banks for marketing their products/services. Banks should ensure that the DSAs engaged by them for marketing their credit card products scrupulously adhere to the Code of Conduct for Credit Card operations of the banks/NBFCs which should be displayed on the website of individual bank/NBFC and be available easily to any credit card holder.
5.3 The bank/NBFC should have a system of random checks and mystery shopping to ensure that their agents have been properly briefed and trained in order to handle with care and caution their responsibilities, particularly in the aspects included in these guidelines like soliciting customers, hours for calling, privacy of customer information, conveying the correct terms and conditions of the product on offer, etc.
6.  Protection of Customer Rights
Customer’s rights in relation to credit card operations primarily relate to personal privacy, clarity relating to rights and obligations, preservation of customer records, maintaining confidentiality of customer information and fair practices in debt collection. The card issuing bank/NBFC would be responsible as the principal for all acts of omission or commission of their agents (DSAs / DMAs and recovery agents).
6.1 Right to privacy
  1. Unsolicited cards should not be issued. In case, an unsolicited card is issued and activated without the written consent of the recipient and the latter is billed for the same, the card issuing bank shall not only reverse the charges forthwith, but also pay a penalty without demur to the recipient amounting to twice the value of the charges reversed.
  2.  In addition, the person in whose name the card is issued can also approach the Banking Ombudsman who would determine the amount of compensation payable by the bank to the recipient of the unsolicited card as per the provisions of the Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006, i.e., for loss of complainant’s time, expenses incurred, harassment and mental anguish suffered by him.
  3. There have been instances where unsolicited cards issued have been misused before reaching the person in whose name these have been issued. It is clarified that any loss arising out of misuse of such unsolicited cards will be the responsibility of the card issuing bank/NBFC only and the person in whose name the card has been issued cannot be held responsible for the same.
  4. The consent for the cards issued or the other products offered along with the card has to be explicit and should not be implied. In other words, the written consent of the applicant would be required before issuing a credit card.
  5. Unsolicited loans or other credit facilities should not be offered to the credit card customers. In case an unsolicited credit facility is extended without the consent of the recipient and the latter objects to the same, the credit sanctioning bank/NBFC shall not only withdraw the credit limit, but also be liable to pay such penalty as may be considered appropriate.
  6. The card issuing bank/NBFC should not unilaterally upgrade credit cards and enhance credit limits. Prior consent of the borrower should invariably be taken whenever there are any change/s in terms and conditions.
  7. Banks may ensure that they engage telemarketers who comply with directions/regulations on the subject issued by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) from time to time.
6.2 Customer confidentiality
  1. The card issuing bank/NBFC should not reveal any information relating to customers obtained at the time of opening the account or issuing the credit card to any other person or organization without obtaining their specific consent, as regards the purpose/s for which the information will be used and the organizations with whom the information will be shared. Instances have come to light where banks, as part of the MITCs, obtain the consent of the customer for sharing the information furnished by him while applying for the credit card, with other agencies. Banks should give the customer the option to decide as to whether he is agreeable for the bank sharing with other agencies the information furnished by him at the time of applying for credit card. The application form for credit card may be suitably modified to explicitly provide for the same. Further, in case where the customers gives his consent for the bank sharing the information with other agencies, banks should explicitly state and explain clearly to the customer the full meaning/ implications of the disclosure clause. Banks/NBFCs should satisfy themselves, based on specific legal advice, that the information being sought from them is not of such nature as will violate the provisions of the laws relating to secrecy in the transactions. Banks/NBFCs would be solely responsible for the correctness or otherwise of the data provided for the purpose.
  2. In case of providing information relating to credit history / repayment record of the card holder to a credit information company (specifically authorized by RBI), the bank/NBFC may explicitly bring to the notice of the customer that such information is being provided in terms of the Credit Information Companies (Regulation) Act, 2005.
  3. Before reporting default status of a credit card holder to a Credit Information Company which has obtained Certificate of Registration from RBI and of which the bank / NBFC is a member, banks/NBFCs should ensure that they adhere to a procedure, duly approved by their Board, including issuing of sufficient notice to such card holder about the intention to report him/ her as defaulter to the Credit Information Company. The procedure should also cover the notice period for such reporting as also the period within which such report will be withdrawn in the event the customer settles his dues after having been reported as defaulter. Banks /NBFCs should be particularly careful in the case of cards where there are pending disputes. The disclosure/ release of information, particularly about the default, should be made only after the dispute is settled as far as possible. In all cases, a well laid down procedure should be transparently followed. These procedures should also be transparently made known as part of MITCs.
  4. The disclosure to the DSAs / recovery agents should also be limited to the extent that will enable them to discharge their duties. Personal information provided by the card holder but not required for recovery purposes should not be released by the card issuing bank/NBFC. The card issuing bank /NBFCs should ensure that the DSAs / DMAs do not transfer or misuse any customer information during marketing of credit card products.
6.3 Fair Practices in debt collection
  1. In the matter of recovery of dues, banks should ensure that they, as also their agents, adhere to the extant instructions on Fair Practice Code for lenders (circular DBOD.Leg.No.BC.104/09.07.007/2002-03 dated May 5, 2003) as also BCSBI’s Code of Bank’s Commitment to Customers(those banks which have subscribed to the BCSBI Code). In case banks have their own code for collection of dues, they should, at the minimum, incorporate all the terms of BCSBI’s Code referred above.
  2. In particular, in regard to appointment of third party agencies for debt collection, it is essential that such agents refrain from action that could damage the integrity and reputation of the bank/NBFC and that they observe strict customer confidentiality. All letters issued by recovery agents must contain the name and address of a responsible senior officer of the card issuing bank whom the customer can contact at his location.
  3. Banks /NBFCs / their agents should not resort to intimidation or harassment of any kind, either verbal or physical, against any person in their debt collection efforts, including acts intended to humiliate publicly or intrude the privacy of the credit card holders’ family members, referees and friends, making threatening and anonymous calls or making false and misleading representations.
  4. The banks should also ensure to comply with the guidelines in respect of engagement of recovery agents (circular No.DBOD. No. Leg. BC.75 /09.07.005/2007-08 dated April 24, 2008) issued by RBI. These guidelines inter-alia cover aspects relating to i) engagement of Recovery Agents including verification of antecedents of their employees by agents, (ii) incentives to recovery agents – banks to ensure that contracts with the recovery agents do not induce adoption of uncivilized, unlawful and questionable behaviour or recovery process, (iii) methods followed by recovery agents, (iv) training to recovery agents, (v) taking possession of property mortgaged /hypothecated to banks, (vi) use of forum of Lok Adalats, (vii) complaints against the bank/recovery agents, and (viii) periodical review of the recovery agents’ mechanism.
6.4 Insurance cover to cardholders
In cases where the banks are offering any insurance cover to their credit card holders, in tie-up with insurance companies, the banks may consider obtaining in writing from the credit card holders the details of nominee/s for the insurance cover in respect of accidental death and disablement benefits. Banks may ensure that the relevant nomination details are recorded by the Insurance Company. Banks may also consider issuing a letter to the credit card holder indicating the details regarding the name, address and telephone number of the Insurance Company which will handle the claims relating to the insurance cover.
7 Redressal of Grievances
7.1 Generally, a time limit of 60 (sixty) days may be given to the customers for preferring their complaints / grievances.
7.2 The card issuing bank /NBFC should constitute Grievance Redressal machinery within the bank/NBFC and give wide publicity about it through electronic and print media. The name and contact number of designated grievance redressal officer of the bank /NBFC should be mentioned on the credit card bills. The designated officer should ensure that genuine grievances of credit card subscribers are redressed promptly without involving delay.
7.3 Banks/NBFCs should ensure that their call centre staff is trained adequately to competently handle all customer complaints.
7.4 Banks/NBFCs should also have a mechanism to escalate automatically unresolved complaints from a call center to higher authorities and the details of such mechanism should be put in public domain through their website.
7.5 The grievance redressal procedure of the bank/NBFC and the time frame fixed for responding to the complaints should be placed on the bank's website. The name, designation, address and contact number of important executives as well as the Grievance Redressal Officer of the bank/NBFC may be displayed on the website. There should be a system of acknowledging customers' complaints for follow up, such as complaint number / docket number, even if the complaints are received on phone.
7.6 If a complainant does not get satisfactory response from the bank/NBFC which is a subsidiary of a bank within a maximum period of thirty (30) days from the date of his lodging the complaint, he will have the option to approach the Office of the concerned Banking Ombudsman for redressal of his grievance/s. The bank/NBFC, which is a subsidiary of a bank shall be liable to compensate the complainant for the loss of his time, expenses, financial loss as well as for the harassment and mental anguish suffered by him for the fault of the bank and where the grievance has not been redressed in time.
8  Internal control and monitoring systems
With a view to ensuring that the quality of customer service is ensured on an on-going basis in banks/NBFCs, the Standing Committee on Customer Service in each bank/NBFC should review the credit card operations including reports of defaulters to  a Credit Information Company  which has obtained Certificate of Registration from RBI and of which the bank / NBFC is a member and credit card related complaints on a monthly basis and take measures to improve the services and ensure the orderly growth in the credit card operations. Banks should put up detailed quarterly analysis of credit card related complaints to their Top Management. Card issuing banks should have in place a suitable monitoring mechanism to randomly check the genuineness of merchant transactions. Banks should prepare and place before their Boards/Management Committee a comprehensive Review Report on credit card business on half-yearly basis as at the end of September and March of each accounting year, which should cover essential data on credit card business, such as category and number of cards issued and outstanding, number of active cards, average turnover per card, number of establishments covered, average time taken for recovery of dues from the card holders, debts classified as NPAs and provisions held there-against or amounts written off, details of frauds on credit cards, steps taken to recover the dues, profitability analysis of the business, etc.
9 Fraud Control
9.1   Banks/NBFCs should set up internal control systems to combat frauds and actively participate in fraud prevention committees/ task forces which formulate laws to prevent frauds and take proactive fraud control and enforcement measures.
9.2   With a view to reducing the instances of misuse of lost/stolen cards, it  is recommended to banks/NBFCs that they may consider issuing (i) cards with photographs of the cardholder (ii) cards with PIN and (iii) signature laminated cards or any other advanced methods that may evolve from time to time.
9.3 In terms of instructions issued by Department of Payment and Settlement Systems, Reserve Bank of India on security issues and risk mitigation measures, as amended from time to time, banks have been advised to put in place  a system of providing for additional authentication/ validation based on information not visible on the cards. The same has been extended to Mail order Transactions Order (MOTO) transactions, which are also a subset of the card-not present transactions. Further, banks have been advised to take steps to put in place a system of online alerts for all types of transactions irrespective of the amount, involving the usage of cards at various channels. Banks have also been advised to put in place various security and risk mitigation measures for electronic payment transactions, in terms of guidelines issued by DPSS from time to time.
9.4   Banks are advised to block a lost card immediately on being informed by the customer and formalities, if any, including lodging of FIR can follow within a reasonable period.
9.5   Banks may consider introducing, at the option of the customers, an insurance cover to take care of the liabilities arising out of lost cards. In other words, only those cardholders who are ready to bear the cost of the premium should be provided an appropriate insurance cover in respect of lost cards.
10  Right to impose penalty
Reserve Bank of India reserves the right to impose any penalty on a bank/NBFC under the provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949/the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, respectively for violation of any of these guidelines.
II Issue of Debit Cards by banks
1 Introduction
Debit cards were issued by banks in terms of the guidelines contained in circular DBOD.No.FSC.BC.123/24.01.019/99-2000 dated November 12, 1999, and subsequent amendments and mail box clarifications. After enactment of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007(PSSA), Department of Payment and Settlement Systems (DPSS) of the Reserve Bank of India, has also issued instructions on some aspects of debit cards such as security and risk mitigation, transfer of funds between domestic debit, prepaid and credit cards, and merchant discount rates.  In view of the above, and in supersession of previous instructions, comprehensive guidelines on debit cards were issued. 
In terms of the revised guidelines, banks may ensure to issue debit cards, including co-branded debit cards, without seeking prior approval of the Reserve Bank, subject to the following:
2  Board approved policy
Banks may formulate a comprehensive debit cards issuance policy including policy on co-branded debit cards with the approval of their Boards and issue debit cards to their customers in accordance with this policy. Debit cards should be issued to customers having Saving Bank/Current Accounts but not to cash credit/ loan account holders.
3  Types of debit cards
Banks may issue only online debit cards including co-branded debit cards where there is an immediate debit to the customers’ account, and where straight through processing is involved. 
4  Offline debit cards
Banks are not permitted to issue offline-debit cards. Banks which have been issuing offline debit cards were advised to conduct a review of their offline debit card operations and discontinue operations of such cards within a period of six months from December 12, 2012. Banks may, however, ensure that customers are duly informed regarding switching over to online debit cards. The review and confirmation regarding  discontinuation of issue and operations of offline debit cards should be sent to the Chief General Manager, Department of Banking Operations and Development, Central Office Building, Shahid  Bhagat Singh Marg, Mumbai 400001.  However, till such time as offline cards are phased out, the outstanding balances / unspent balances stored on the cards shall be subject to computation of reserve requirements.
5  Compliance with Know Your Customer (KYC) Norms / Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Standards / Combating of Financing of Terrorism (CFT) / Obligation of banks under PMLA, 2002  
The instructions/ guidelines on KYC/AML/ CFT applicable to banks, issued by RBI from time to time, may be adhered to in respect of all cards issued, including co-branded debit cards.
6  Payment of interest on balances
Payment of interest should be in accordance with interest rate directives as issued from time to time.
7  Terms and conditions for issue of cards to customers
i)  No bank shall dispatch a card to a customer unsolicited, except in the case where the card is a replacement for a card already held by the customer.
ii) The relationship between the bank and the card holder shall be contractual.
iii) Each bank shall make available to the cardholders in writing, a set of  contractual terms and conditions governing the issue and use of such a card. These terms shall maintain a fair balance between the interests of the parties concerned.
iv) The terms shall be expressed clearly.
v) The terms shall specify the basis of any charges, but not necessarily the amount of charges at any point of time.
vi) The terms shall specify the period within which the cardholder’s account would normally be debited.
vii)  The terms may be altered by the bank, but sufficient notice of the change shall be given to the cardholder to enable him to withdraw if he so chooses. A period shall be specified after which time the cardholder would be deemed to have accepted the terms if he had not withdrawn during the specified period.
viii) (a) The terms shall put the cardholder under an obligation to take all appropriate steps to keep safe the card and the means (such as PIN or code) which enable it to be used.
(b) The terms shall put the cardholder under an obligation not to record the PIN or code, in any form that would be intelligible or otherwise accessible to any third party if access is gained to such a record, either honestly or dishonestly.
(c) The terms shall put the cardholder under an obligation to notify the bank immediately after becoming aware:
- of the loss or theft or copying of the card or the means which enable it to be used;
 - of the recording on the cardholder’s account of any unauthorised transaction;
 - of any error or other irregularity in the maintaining of that account by the bank.
(d) The terms shall specify a contact point to which such notification can be made. Such notification can be made at any time of the day or night.
ix)  The terms shall specify that the bank shall exercise care when issuing PINs or codes and shall be under an obligation not to disclose the cardholder’s PIN or code, except to the cardholders.
x)  The terms shall specify that the bank shall be responsible for direct losses incurred by a cardholder due to a system malfunction directly within the bank’s control. However, the bank shall not be held liable for any loss caused by a technical breakdown of the payment system if the breakdown of the system was recognizable for the cardholder by a message on the display of the device or otherwise known. The responsibility of the bank for the non-execution or defective execution of the transaction is limited to the principal sum and the loss of interest subject to the provisions of the law governing the terms.
8 Cash withdrawals
No cash transactions through the debit cards should be offered at the Point of Sale under any facility without prior authorization of Reserve Bank of India under Section 23 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.
9  Security and other aspects
i) The bank shall ensure full security of the debit card. The security of the debit card shall be the responsibility of the bank and the losses incurred by any party on account of breach of security or failure of the security mechanism shall be borne by the bank.
ii) Banks shall keep for a sufficient period of time, internal records to enable operations to be traced and errors to be rectified (taking into account the law of limitation for the time barred cases).
iii)  The cardholder shall be provided with a written record of the transaction after he has completed it, either immediately in the form of receipt or within a reasonable period of time in another form such as the customary bank statement.
iv) The cardholder shall bear the loss sustained up to the time of notification to the bank of any loss, theft or copying of the card but only up to a certain limit (of fixed amount or a percentage of the transaction agreed upon in advance between the cardholder and the bank), except where the cardholder acted fraudulently, knowingly or with extreme negligence.
v)  Each bank shall provide means whereby his customers may at any time of the day or night notify the loss, theft or copying of their payment devices.
vi) On receipt of notification of the loss, theft or copying of the card, the bank shall take all action open to it to stop any further use of the card.
vii)  With a view to reducing the instances of misuse of lost/stolen cards, banks may consider issuing cards with photographs of the cardholder or any other advanced methods that may evolve from time to time.
10  Compliance with DPSS instructions
The issue of debit cards as a payment mechanism would also be subject to relevant guidelines including guidelines on security issues and risk mitigation measures, card-to-card fund transfers, merchant discount rates structure, failed ATM transactions,  etc, issued by the Department of Payment and Settlement Systems under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, as amended from time to time.
11  Issue of International Debit Card
Issue of international debit cards will also be subject to directions issued under Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, as amended from time to time. 
12  Review of operations
The banks should undertake review of their operations/issue of debit cards on half-yearly basis.  The review may include, inter-alia, card usage analysis including cards not used for long durations due to their inherent risks.
13  Reporting requirements
The report on the operations of smart/debit cards issued by banks required to be submitted on a half yearly basis to the Department of Payment and Settlement Systems (DPSS) with a copy to the concerned Regional Office of Department of Banking Supervision in whose jurisdiction the Head Office of the bank is situated, as prescribed in paragraph 14.1 of the Master Circular on Para Banking Activities is discontinued with immediate effect.
14  Redressal of grievances
Banks may ensure to put in place an effective mechanism for redressal of customer complaints. The grievance redressal procedure of the bank and the time frame fixed for responding to the complaints should be placed on the bank's website. The name, designation, address and contact number of important executives as well as the Grievance Redressal Officer of the bank may be displayed on the website. There should be a system of acknowledging customers' complaints for follow up, such as complaint number / docket number, even if the complaints are received on  phone. If a complainant does not get satisfactory response from the bank within a maximum period of thirty (30) days from the date of his lodging the complaint, he will have the option to approach the Office of the concerned Banking Ombudsman for redressal of his grievance/s. DPSS guidelines on timeframe for reconciliation of failed transactions at ATMs as amended from time to time should be complied with in this regard.
15  Co-branding arrangement
Co-branded debit cards issued by banks will be subject to the following terms and conditions, in addition to the above:
  • Board approved policy 

    The co-branding arrangement should be as per the Board approved policy of the bank. The policy may specifically address issues pertaining to the various risks associated with such an arrangement including reputation risk and put in place suitable risk mitigation measures.
  •  Due diligence 

    Banks should carry out due diligence in respect of the non-banking entity with which they intend to enter into tie-up for issue of such cards to protect themselves against the reputation risk they are exposed to in such an arrangement. Banks may ensure that in cases where the proposed co-branding partner is a financial entity, it has obtained necessary approvals from its regulator for entering into the co-branding agreement.
  • Outsourcing of activities 

    The card issuing bank would be liable for all acts of the co-branding partner. The bank may ensure adherence to the guidelines on “Managing Risks and Code of Conduct in outsourcing of financial services by banks” as contained in the circular DBOD.No.BP.40/21.04.158/2006-07 dated November 3, 2006, as amended from time to time.
  • Role of non-bank entity

    The role of the non-bank entity under the tie-up arrangement should be limited to marketing/ distribution of the cards or providing access to the cardholder for the goods/services that are offered.
  • Confidentiality of customer information

    The card issuing bank should not reveal any information relating to customers obtained at the time of opening the account or issuing the card and the co-branding non-banking entity should not be permitted to access any details of customer’s accounts that may violate bank’s secrecy obligations.
Banks, which were granted specific approvals for issue of co-branded debit cards in the past, were advised to ensure that the co-branding arrangement is in conformity with the instructions mentioned above. In case, the co-branding arrangement is between two banks, the card issuing bank may ensure compliance with the above conditions.
16  Unsolicited Commercial Communication
As stated in paragraph I 6.1(g), banks may ensure that they engage telemarketers who comply with directions/ regulations issued by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) from time to time.
III  Issuance of rupee denominated co-branded pre-paid cards
1  Introduction
Banks were permitted to issue smart cards subject to the instructions contained in our circulars DBOD.No.FSC.BC.123/24.01.019/99-2000 dated November 12, 1999, DBOD. No.FSC.BC.133/ 24.01.019/2000-01 dated June 18, 2001 and DBOD.No.FSC.BC.88/24.01.019/2001-02 dated April 11, 2002. While foreign currency denominated pre-paid cards, including co-branding arrangements, if any, can be issued subject to the guidelines issued under Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, as amended from time to time, issue of rupee denominated pre-paid payment instruments is subject to the stipulations contained in the Notification on the Issuance and Operation of Pre-paid Payment Instruments in India (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2009 by Department of Payment and Settlement Systems (DPSS) of the Reserve Bank of India, under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, vide circular DPSS.CO.PD.No.1873/02.14.06/2008-09 dated April 27, 2009, as amended from time to time. In terms of paragraph 6 of circular DPSS.CO.No.1041/02.14.006/ 2010-2011 dated November 04, 2010, banks/NBFCs/other persons desirous of issuing such co-branded pre-paid instruments may seek one time approval from Reserve Bank of India.
Accordingly, in supersession of the earlier guidelines on issue of smart cards, it was decided to grant general permission to banks to issue rupee denominated co-branded pre-paid cards in India, subject to the following terms and conditions:
2 Board approved policy
The co-branding arrangement should be as per the Board approved policy of the bank. The policy may specifically address issues pertaining to the various risks associated with such an arrangement including reputation risk and put in place suitable risk mitigation measures.
3  Due diligence
Banks should carry out due diligence in respect of the non-banking entity with which they intend to enter into tie-up for issue of such cards to protect themselves against the reputation risk they are exposed to in such an arrangement. In case of proposed tie up with a financial entity, they may ensure that that entity has the approval of its regulator for entering into such arrangement.
4  Outsourcing of activities
The card issuing bank would be liable for all acts of the co-branding partner. The bank may ensure adherence to the guidelines on “Managing Risks and Code of Conduct in outsourcing of financial services by banks” as contained in the circular DBOD.No.BP.40/21.04.158/2006-07 dated November 3, 2006, as amended from time to time.
5  Role of non-bank entity
The role of the non-bank entity under the tie-up arrangement should be limited to marketing/ distribution of the cards or providing access to the cardholder for the goods/services that are offered.
6  Compliance with Know Your Customer (KYC) Norms / Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Standards / Combating of Financing of Terrorism (CFT) / Obligation of banks under PMLA, 2002  
The instructions/ guidelines on KYC/AML/ CFT applicable to banks, issued by RBI from time to time, should be adhered to, in respect of all cards issued under the co-branding arrangement.
7  Confidentiality of customer information
The card issuing bank should not reveal any information relating to customers obtained at the time of opening the account or issuing the card and the co-branding non-banking entity should not be permitted to access any details of customer’s accounts that may violate bank’s secrecy obligations.
8  Payment of interest
As hitherto, no interest may be paid on the balances transferred to pre-paid payment cards.
9  Compliance with DPSS Guidelines on Issue and Operation of pre-paid instruments in India
The arrangement will be subject to adherence/ compliance with instructions issued by DPSS from time to time on issue and operation of pre-paid instruments, which includes pre-paid cards, in India.
Banks, which were granted specific approvals for issue of rupee denominated co-branded pre-paid cards in the past, are advised to ensure that the co-branding arrangement is in conformity with the instructions mentioned above. In case, the co-branding arrangement is between two banks, the card issuing bank may ensure compliance with the above conditions.
10  Unsolicited Commercial Communication
As stated in paragraph I 6.1(g), banks may ensure that they engage telemarketers who comply with directions/ regulations issued by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) from time to time.

ANNEX
1. Most Important Terms and Conditions (MITCs)
(a) Fees and Charges
  1. Joining fees for primary card holder and for add-on card holder
  2. Annual membership fees for primary and add-on card holder
  3. Cash advance fee
  4. Service charges levied for certain transactions
  5. Interest free (grace) period - illustrated with examples
  6. Finance charges for both revolving credit and cash advances
  7. Overdue interest charges - to be given on monthly & annualised basis
  8. Charges in case of default
(b) Drawal limits
  1. Credit limit
  2. Available credit limit
  3. Cash withdrawal limit
(c) Billing
  1. Billing statements—periodicity and mode of sending
  2. Minimum amount payable
  3. Method of payment
  4. Billing disputes resolution
  5. Contact particulars of 24 hour call centers of card issuer
  6. Grievances redressal escalation—contact particulars of officers to be contacted
  7. Complete postal address of card issuing bank
  8. Toll free number for customer care services
(d) Default and circumstances
  1. Procedure including notice period for reporting a card holder as defaulter
  2. Procedure for withdrawal of default report and the period within which the default report would be withdrawn after settlement of dues
  3. Recovery procedure in case of default
  4. Recovery of dues in case of death/ permanent incapacitance of cardholder
  5. Available insurance cover for card holder and date of activation of policy
(e) Termination / revocation of card membership
  1. Procedure for surrender of card by card holder - due notice
(f) Loss/theft/misuse of card
  1. Procedure to be followed in case of loss/ theft/ misuse of card-mode of intimation to card issuer
  2. Liability of card holder in case of (i) above
(g)  Disclosure
Type of information relating to card holder to be disclosed with and without approval of card holder
2. Disclosure of MITCs - Items to be disclosed in stages :
  1. During marketing  - Item no: a
  2. At application  - Item nos:all items from a to g
  3. Welcome Kit - Item nos: all items from a to g
  4. On billing - Item nos: a, b and c,
  5. On an ongoing basis, any change of the terms and conditions
Note :
  • The font size of MITC should be minimum Arial-12
  • The normal terms and conditions communicated by the card issuer to the card holder at different stages will continue as hitherto.
For More update please go to the mention below RBI Website;

https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_ViewMasCirculardetails.aspx?id=8087#A2

------------------------------------------------Thank you--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------